One hates to be absolute, but in my view, there is no such thing as humane meat.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
All of us in society are supposed to believe that cruelty to animals is wrong and that it is a good thing to prevent needless suffering. So if that is true, how can meat be acceptable under any but the most extraordinary circumstances, such as perhaps roasting the bird who died flying into a window?
The kind of funny irony is that a lot of people talk about ethical meat eating as if it's a way to care about things, but also not to alienate yourself from the rest of the world. But it's so much more alienating than vegetarianism.
One can not be just if one is not humane.
I can hardly eat meat because it has to look like something what it was not when it was alive.
I'm not strictly vegetarian, but meat doesn't play a big part in my diet.
Animals that we eat are raised for food in the most economical way possible, and the serious food producers do it in the most humane way possible. I think anyone who is a carnivore needs to understand that meat does not originally come in these neat little packages.
The only meat I eat is from animals I've killed myself.
By the way, I'm not a vegetarian. I have a lot of respect for people who are vegetarian for religious or ethical reasons.
I know lots and lots and lots of vegetarians who think it's perfectly all right to kill animals for food to eat, but don't do it because they think all the ways in which it's done are wrong.
When it comes to meat, change is almost always cast as an absolute. You are a vegetarian or you are not.