The reality is that it's harder to recruit pediatric subspecialists if you're not recruiting them for a children's hospital.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The problem with most children's hospitals is that they are passive. They are high quality. They are filled with the best doctors. But their function is to wait until kids get sick and get referred in.
The health care industry can play a great role in this by being aware of the fact that these children form perhaps the most neglected group of people in the country, largely because it is hard to find them.
It's really difficult working with kids and with babies because they are not cooperative subjects: they are not socialized into the idea that they should cheerfully and cooperatively give you information. They're not like undergraduates, who you can bribe with beer money or course credit.
Working with special needs children is hard.
It is sometimes easier to head an institute for the study of child guidance than it is to turn one brat into a decent human being.
It is very easy to get people focused on children.
There are many women with children under five who want to work and who lack affordable, high-quality child care.
I don't understand the theory that nonprofit hospitals that run at forty percent capacity and do not pay taxes should be granted some special privilege. I like level playing fields.
We have guidance counselors that have caseloads of 500 to 600 children. We don't have enough to help the children.
However, most of my part, I play a pediatrician, and most of my role had to do with being in another place, staying at the hospital and trying to save kids and stay until people could come. So, it was more based on reality.
No opposing quotes found.