I was a very bad journalist. Awful. I would just invent everything. If I did an interview, I had a preconception of what that person should say and I would put my words in his mouth.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I was a bad journalist.
I was never a good journalist, because I would make things up. A lot of people frowned on that, which is why I ended up in fiction.
I became a journalist partly so that I wouldn't ever have to rely on the press for my information.
I always felt journalists had a very clear idea of what they wanted to write about me before the interview began.
I'm a reporter - if I don't interview someone, I don't have much to say, and I definitely can't just sit down and knock out 800 words on any subject you give me.
I was a lousy journalist. I could never be objective. Sometimes I invented the whole story.
I would never have been a good reporter because I am not accurate regarding facts.
I became a journalist because one didn't have to specialise.
I met all these important people and did all these stories, but I always had such excellent producers and assistants. I could show up to interview a world leader or a criminal and they would have things so well prepared anyone could have done it. It wasn't about 'me,' it was about 'us.'
I'm a terrible interviewer. I'm not a journalist - although I have a Peabody Award - and I'm not really a late-night host. What I am is honest.