For the Kremlin, it is more feasible to preserve its great-power status in cooperation with the United States than in confrontation.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The United States has to have the capability to deal with more than one enemy at one time and be able to confront them and win.
Russia can become a strategic partner in a fight against international terrorism.
We will always apply the same principles of collective security, prudent caution, and superior weaponry that enabled us to peacefully prevail in the long cold war against the Soviet Union.
Relieving the risk of a nuclear conflict with Iran diplomatically is superior than trying to do that militarily.
I think that it's a vital moment now for Russian democracy to convince people that it's only our actions, our joined actions and protests that could force Kremlin to reconsider its plans to abolish presidential elections.
The struggle to get weapons is continuous, but the United States will aid us, if it finds Israel displaying a willingness for peace.
Our enemies and allies alike must know that aggressors will pay an unspeakable price for challenging the United States. The best way to impose that price is global military dominance.
Again, I think we have much greater diplomatic weight by having all of us sit on the same side of the table wanting the same thing, and putting it to the North Koreans.
U.S. adversaries exploit power gaps. It's easier for Russia to invade Ukraine with irregular forces out of uniform, the so-called 'little green men,' than to send a conventional army that would challenge NATO.
The surest way to empower the new terrorist gangs would be to withdraw from U.S. diplomatic missions.