A lot of male actors are method actors and they become the characters which they both were.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Male actors get into production, share profit, and they don't take money at times but are involved in some capacity which is economical and resourceful. These things suit them; as they have made a place for themselves, they have command over the box office.
It's like playing tennis, you play a different rally with different people. Every actor is different and the chemistry between actors is different.
All good actors are actresses. The more like a woman they are, the better they act, because a man's salvation is his femininity. Women have stronger sensibilities than men, which allows them to go a bit deeper when they are on and off the stage.
As an actor, it's fun to play guys who aren't just locked into a male pattern, but a lot of guys you're asked to play are fairly macho and have a certain rigid standard they're living by.
I think all actors are supposed to be character actors.
I think male roles are generally much better written. So for actresses, we're always dealing with trying to inject a role with more truth than the writer possibly had in mind.
Film actors are, by nature, more complicated than stage actors.
Being a good actor isn't easy. Being a man is even harder. I want to be both before I'm done.
I don't really think there's much difference between a character actor and a leading man besides aesthetics.
I think male actors get confused by their own vanity.
No opposing quotes found.