The biggest obstacle was mixing abortion with overpopulation. These are two things that have nothing to do with each other.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The idea of making access to safe abortions harder and more expensive and more difficult, having to travel across state lines - that puts women's health and lives in jeopardy, which is something I think no one wants.
I extend that to the abortion issue, I extend that to the so-called gay rights issue, I think this is a freedom principle and consistent with the analysis in the economic area as well.
I think if you hearken back to partial-birth abortion... everybody said, you know, it's not constitutional. It can't pass; it can't go anywhere, and it took time to do that, and it even had to succeed a presidential veto. But it eventually did.
The first thing to improve society is not banning abortion, but making sure that everyone who had a child is in the best position to be able to rear it.
Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of.
I really didn't know there was two sides to the abortion issue.
There are lots of other issues in policy including the stem cell issue.
Prior to ROE V. WADE, abortions were common even though they were illegal. I don't think making them illegal again is going to solve the problem.
Ban partial-birth abortion except to save mother's life.
The human overpopulation issue is the topic I see as the most vital to solve if our children and grandchildren are to have a good quality of life.