Film will only became an art when its materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There is no sense in making a film that no-one will go and see, just to create a perfect, but useless, work of art.
Film is a different art form with its own demands and its own riches.
You have to have a certain amount of limitations, I think, to make art and to make something that can be alive on film. Money can get in the way of that.
It's disappointing to see films become pure entertainment, so that it's not an art form.
The only thing approaching art in a movie is the script.
All art becomes history as soon as it is made, so it is inevitably part of a tradition. It doesn't matter a toss if it is in paint or in film; it is all art.
Movies were never an art form, they were entertainment. It just evolved into an art form from there, and it's still evolving in different ways.
First of all, what in this world does not revolve around money? But money is a big part of film, unlike a lot of other art forms.
The only way you can continue to make artistic films is to make an occasional one of those. They kind of keep your marketability going to the extent that people will employ you.
When you're a filmmaker you're part of a very expensive art form.
No opposing quotes found.