I have a painting where somebody's holding a chicken, and underneath the chicken is somebody's head.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If you know somethin' well, you can always paint it but people would be better off buyin' chickens.
If I hadn't started painting, I would have raised chickens.
If I didn't start painting, I would have raised chickens.
Painting is sometimes like those recipes where you do all manner of elaborate things to a duck, and then end up putting it on one side and only using the skin.
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.
Remember that a painting - before it is a battle horse, a nude model, or some anecdote - is essentially a flat surface covered with colours assembled in a certain order.
When I am finishing a picture, I hold some God-made object up to it - a rock, a flower, the branch of a tree or my hand - as a final test. If the painting stands up beside a thing man cannot make, the painting is authentic. If there's a clash between the two, it's bad art.
I have got pictures all around the rooms I sit in. I have got a very mad picture of a dog standing on a black thing on a piece of rope. It was drawn and painted by a Romanian poet who was under house arrest, and it is terrific.
A pen is to me as a beak is to a hen.
I want paint to work as flesh.
No opposing quotes found.