The novel is not so much a literary genre, but a literary space, like a sea that is filled by many rivers.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think the novel is not so much a literary genre, but a literary space, like a sea that is filled by many rivers. The novel receives streams of science, philosophy, poetry and contains all of these; it's not simply telling a story.
I think that there are empty ecological niches in the literary landscape crying to be filled and when a book more or less fills a niche it's seized on, even when it's a far from perfect fit.
Literary fiction, as a strict genre, is all but dead. Meanwhile, most genres flourish.
But novels are never about what they are about; that is, there is always deeper, or more general, significance. The author may not be aware of this till she is pretty far along with it.
'Drown' was always a hybrid book. It's connected stories - partially a story collection but partially a novel. I always wanted the reader to decide which genre they thought the book belonged to more - story, novel, neither, both.
I really enjoy writing novels. It's like the ocean. You can just build a boat and take off.
Literature precedes genre.
Love of place is one of the characteristics I enjoy most about novelists.
Literary imagination is an aesthetic object offered by a writer to a lover of books.
The novel has always been a contradictory form. Here is a long form narrative mainly read originally by consumers who were only newly literate or limited in their literacy. The novel ranked below poetry, essay and history in prestige for a long time.
No opposing quotes found.