Shakespeare's language does not require a British accent. It requires a facility with language, and that's all.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
There's a specificity of language that's required in Shakespeare that most drama students in England deal with - a specificity of language that is somehow not as clear in a lot of American schools.
I think Shakespeare is like a dialect. If I heard a broad Scots accent, I'd probably struggle at first but then I'd start to look for words I recognise and I'd get the gist. I think Shakespeare is like that.
The English people, a lot of them, would not be able to understand a word of spoken Shakespeare. There are people who do and I'm not denying they exist. But it's a far more philistine country than people think.
I spent a lot of time in London when I was growing up and I've always picked up accents without even really meaning to. It used to get me into trouble as a child.
I'm one of those people that feels that Americans that shouldn't do Shakespeare... The rhythms of the English language and the mannerisms of the English speech seems to work effortlessly with William Shakespeare, but when Americans do it, something seems stuck.
Shakespeare language is fantastic, and to be honest, you don't need to do anything to Shakespeare.
I think it's sort of a rite of passage for a British actor to try and get the American accent and have a good crack at doing that.
I think most British people who say they can do an American accent are so bad at it. I find it excruciating. I find it excruciating the other way around, too.
The thing with being able to do accents is that it's still completely separate from being an actor.
You can't do Shakespeare with a Southern accent, honey.