My observation is that women are merely waiting for their husbands to assume leadership.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If more women are in leadership roles, we'll stop assuming they shouldn't be.
People don't always want to have females as leaders.
Men display less self-doubt and lead with what seems always like a sense of force and direction. We are not as familiar with women leaders, and so we question their skills. As women, we always need to work harder to prove our competence.
A fact of modern life is that it takes women longer to get ready than men.
Maybe if everybody in leadership was a woman, you might not get into the conflicts in the first place. But if you watch the women who have made it to the top, they haven't exactly been non-aggressive - including me.
If a guy is intimidated by a woman in leadership, he has real problems with his own concepts of masculinity. That's a harsh statement, but I believe it to be true.
When women are in positions of power it's a hard place to be, especially when that position involves bossing men around.
There are those who maintain that in this world women have no right to interfere in the affairs of state, in politics, in plots and counter-plots. Others that are who, more chivalrous, are willing to admit that women have as much right to act, think, and speak as men.
Women seem not to understand, or underestimate, the profound power they have over their husbands.
I don't agree with all-male leaderships. Men cannot be left to run things on their own. I think it's a thoroughly bad thing to have a men-only leadership.
No opposing quotes found.