'Insidious' is independent. It's like the 'Clerks' of horror films, you know?
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Independent films, for the most part, to me, are not so independent. They often feel like people auditioning for a big commercial career. They often do not have independent spirit to them.
Definition of an independent film is torture with less money and time.
Independent film is film that has thought in it. There's no independent thought in studio films. It's collective thought.
I love independent filmmaking. I don't agree with a lot of it, but that's the point.
Independent film is not only an oxymoron; it doesn't exist anymore.
I like to believe that intimate moments between characters don't need to be relegated to independent films.
Independent films are where you really get to cut your teeth and have some fun and do the things that mainstream Hollywood doesn't want to do.
Independent film is for actors that love to act.
I see horror as part of legitimate film. I don't see it as an independent genre that has nothing to do with the rest of cinema.
'Insidious 2' is a direct continuation of the first movie. We literally pick up from where we left off at the end of the first film. And whereas the first movie is a twist on the haunted house genre, the second movie is a twist on the classic domestic thriller.