As far as 3-D goes, I don't know if that will stay very long because things are moving so rapidly.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think that two-dimensional film will always be here to stay because it always has its place, but 3D does too.
I think a playwright realizes after he finishes working on the script that this is only the beginning. What will happen when it moves into three dimensions?
Video games lend themselves completely to 3-D.
When you make a 3-D movie you actually have to plan the way the visuals look because there's a parallax issue, and there's an issue of editing; you can't edit very quickly in 3-D because the eye won't adjust fast enough for it.
I've always been thinking in three dimensions, ever since I started working with computer animation in the early '80s.
I love 3-D. I have been a big fan of 3-D for a long, long time. I took my 1988 wedding pictures in 3-D!
I don't think every movie should be made in 3-D, and it should depend on whether it's one of these films that's more immersive or needs to be taken to another world. I'm interested in other formats.
I wasn't sold on 3-D until it was in my own home. The images jump out at you, even more so than in the theater, because you're in tighter quarters and you're closer to the TV, so it feels like the depth is very dramatic.
There are many cells you could look at forever in 3D.
The only thing about 3-D is the dullness of the image.