There's never been a mathematical equation that says a good experience making a movie equates to a good movie, or a bad experience on a set is going to lead to a bad movie.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I sometimes think it's better to go with a bad movie that is true to a certain point of view than to take something and make people try to like it when they're not supposed to.
I have a very simple definition of a good movie: a good movie makes you forget you're watching a movie.
I've made movies that I thought were okay, but then I was very good. And sometimes you're in a movie and you think, 'I wish more people saw that' - because you're good. And it just works out that the movie gets lost. But that's show business.
Good filmmakers make bad films; it happens.
The only reason you make a movie is not to make or set out to do a good or a bad movie, it's just to see what you learn for the next one.
It's possible for me to make a bad movie out of a good script, but I can't make a good movie from a bad script.
You learn as much from doing a bad film as a good one.
There was a time when all that mattered was that you were in a good movie.
Nobody in Hollywood ever sets out to make a bad movie ever but about 99% of the time, that's what happens.
If you just love movies enough, you can make a good one.