Corporate competition is fierce, viewed by many as economic warfare where all is fair. But politics... now, this is something unique.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The paradigm of competition is a race: by rewarding the winner, we encourage everyone to run faster. When capitalism really works this way, it does a good job; but its defenders are wrong in assuming it always works this way.
It's competition that forces companies to get out of their complacency.
When companies get together secretly to fix prices and attempt to eliminate competition, honest businessmen suffer. I think this is wrong.
Competition is always a good thing. It forces us to do our best. A monopoly renders people complacent and satisfied with mediocrity.
I do not want to put U.S. companies in a position where their competitors are behaving in a way that is inconsistent with the way they are required to behave. That is neither fair, nor will it solve the problem.
For the exploitation of human greed, they have devised comparison and competition. Right from childhood on, we are indoctrinated to compare and compete, and there is a word, a phrase: 'free and fair competition.'
Activity in politics also produces eager competition and sharp rivalry.
As a free-market guy, I love competition. That includes political competition.
Everybody agrees that you want competition. But you have to have rules of fair competition if you want to have competitors to enter the market.
Corporations are like countries now, there's a king, there are serfs, there's a court, basically everything but moats. They're feudal societies, and there are good ones and bad ones.
No opposing quotes found.