My basis of morality is this: does this action enhance life, or does it denigrate life? Does it build up or does it tear down?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die, but to enjoy yourself and live.
Reverence for life affords me my fundamental principle of morality.
We are naturally moral beings, but our environments can enhance - or, sadly, degrade - this innate moral sense.
Increase of material comforts, it may be generally laid down, does not in any way whatsoever conduce to moral growth.
The science of morality is about maximizing psychological and social health. It's really no more inflammatory than that.
Morality will perform all this; and Morality is the fruit of Illumination.
Whatever contributes to the preservation of life is good; all that destroys life is evil.
The true basis of morality is utility; that is, the adaptation of our actions to the promotion of the general welfare and happiness; the endeavour so to rule our lives that we may serve and bless mankind.
I saw that all beings are fated to happiness: action is not life, but a way of wasting some force, an enervation. Morality is the weakness of the brain.
As for morality, well that's all tied up with the question of consciousness.