This is his first punishment, that by the verdict of his own heart no guilty man is acquitted.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It is better that a guilty man should not be brought to trial than that he should be acquitted.
When a person is found not guilty, they're found not guilty.
Every guilty person is his own hangman.
Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.
The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else.
This book here, 'The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder,' in it, I put together a case against George Bush that could result - it absolutely could result in his being prosecuted for first-degree murder in an American courtroom.
I come from the liberal side of thinking: Better one guilty man should walk free than one innocent man found guilty.
Rather leave the crime of the guilty unpunished than condemn the innocent.
Only the man who has enough good in him to feel the justice of the penalty can be punished.
The judge is found guilty when a criminal is acquitted.