I've always believed that if you support reform or you support a particular idea that you ought to fund that idea first and not the system.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm one of those that have said, one of my key principles is I will not support a health care reform bill that is not deficit-neutral, period.
Like all of my colleagues, I believe financial reform is necessary now.
The fight for reform comes down to a simple goal: giving our citizens the confidence that government serves the people first and the people only.
I support health care reform in this country, but the current bills we have before us are too big, too costly, and the people who send me to Washington to be their voice are opposed to them and this process.
Rest assured that my support for any eventual reform package will be based firmly upon what is in the best interests of the people of Upstate New York, not any party or president.
Obviously, I have certain policy positions that I push and advocate for that would benefit people dealing in a system that breeds inequality and makes life more difficult for people.
This country, of course, needs fundamental reform of our financial regulatory system, as I, and many other financial institution executives, have publicly advocated for a considerable period.
My goal for reform is not necessarily to pass laws but to make sure the laws are being followed.
I came to the conclusion months ago, and I said it to members of Congress, that the only way people are going to fully appreciate what this reform is if we pass it and implement it and it becomes not a caricature but a reality, and I still believe that. So I think it will be easier to sell it moving forward than it was to this point.
I've advocated a proportional tax system. You make $10 billion, you pay a billion. You make $10, you pay one. And everybody gets treated the same way.
No opposing quotes found.