I think it is shocking that 15- and 16-year-olds leave school unable to add up and with the reading ability of a four-year-old.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think every parent knows that, like, boys and girls are different. And we just don't take that into account in schools on those things like required reading lists. 'Cause that was my experience, say, with my son, who had to read 'Little House on the Prairie' when he was in third grade.
One of the problems is that kids who don't read - who are not doing well in school - they know they're not doing well. And they want everyone to be in that same category.
There's only so much academic disruption that a young child can deal with before he just can't catch up.
Children without access to quality early education programs start kindergarten with an 18-month disadvantage, and that gap continues to widen. By the time they are in fourth grade, many cannot do math or read at grade level.
Children find prescriptive reading lists daunting, and they are a dangerous thing to have in schools.
No skill shapes a child's future success in school or in life more than the ability to read.
Early on I came to realize something, and it came from the mail I received from kids. That is, kids at that pivotal age, 12, 13 or 14, they're still deeply affected by what they read, some are changed by what they read, books can change the way they feel about the world in general. I don't think that's true of adults as much.
If children are reading well by the 3rd or 4th grade then everything else works.
I say this as a young dad seeing children going into primary school: I don't think we should underestimate the formative effect on a child of those first years in primary school.
I don't see a day when teenagers don't read. They are very enthusiastic. That is so inspiring to me.
No opposing quotes found.