I want to see the farm piece passed, but the nearly a trillion dollars in SNAP spending for food stamps is way too much.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Food stamps are an investment in our future.
SNAP is a critical anti-hunger program that feeds millions of low income Americans, including children, veterans, and seniors who would not otherwise have the resources to buy groceries.
Anytime you cut food stamps, it naturally affects sales. People spend less.
I know some of you don't care about food stamps, but I'm telling you if it feeds children, you do care about it.
In my district, California 14, we have about 4,000 families who are on food stamps, but some of my colleagues have thousands and thousands more. Yet, they somehow feel like crusaders, like heroes, when they vote to cut food stamps.
Every dollar of SNAP benefits generates $1.84 in the economy in terms of economic activity. If people are able to buy a little more in the grocery store, someone has to stock it, package it, shelve it, process it, ship it. All of those are jobs. It's the most direct stimulus you can get in the economy during these tough times.
It's outrageous that many enlisted people qualify for food stamps because military salaries are so low.
They advertise on the radio for food stamps!
Sure, food stamps are occasionally misused, but anyone familiar with business knows that the abuse of food subsidies is far greater in the corporate suite. Every time an executive wines and dines a hot date on the corporate dime, the average taxpayer helps foot the bill.
Why do we need to support the food stamp program? Because low-income families experience unemployment at a far higher rate than other income groups. Because cutting nutritional assistance programs is immoral and shortsighted, and protecting families from hunger improves their health and educational outcomes.
No opposing quotes found.