If you don't have collective agreements between unions and employers, governments have to legislate more.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The unions still have a job to do, representing their members' interests to governments and parliaments. And I think collective agreements still have a role, alongside markets and laws.
There is nothing that says unions have a God-given right to be there. We have to work at it and make ourselves relevant to every section of the workforce.
If I were the president of the United States, I would make unions illegal. They no longer serve a functional purpose in democracy, in my view.
I sometimes think that unions don't understand that we live in a free society, and people have the right to not select union representation if they don't want it.
Many people do not realize that where unions have bargaining rights employers cannot raise wages or improve benefit plans any more than they can reduce them without of the consent of the union.
That's what unions do. They can get money, they can get support, they can get manpower.
Private unions, such as the UAW, is a choice between employees and employers. If that is what they want, then who am I to say you can't have it?
Even in Britain, the trade unions tell me that employment contracts have less protection than in the past.
It has no enforceable standards to stop a union from conspiring with employers to keep another stronger union out or from negotiating contracts with lower pay and standards that members of another union have spent a lifetime establishing.
I believe if an individual wants to join organized labor and work under a union contract, they should have the legal right to do so. At the same token, a person who does not want to work under organized labor and wants to work should have the ability to do so without the threat of having to join and having to pay dues to organized labor.
No opposing quotes found.