Is anarchism possible? The failure of attempts to attain freedom does not mean the cause is lost.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Is anarchism desirable? Well, who does not seek freedom? What man, unless willing to declare himself in bondage, would care to call any control agreeable? Think about it!
I'm not an anarchist any longer, because I've concluded that anarchism is an impractical ideal.
I know of no better name than Anarchism.
Anarchism is founded on the observation that since few men are wise enough to rule themselves, even fewer are wise enough to rule others.
Anarchism is the great liberator of man from the phantoms that have held him captive; it is the arbiter and pacifier of the two forces for individual and social harmony.
Anarchism means all sort of things to different people, but the traditional anarchists' movements assumed that there'd be a highly organized society, just one organized from below with direct participation and so on.
I never have been an anarchist, I've always had goals and always have acted out of love.
Every anarchist is a baffled dictator.
For, just as it has been said that there is no half-way house between Rome and Reason, so it may be said that there is no half-way house between State Socialism and Anarchism.
Direct action is the logical, consistent method of Anarchism.
No opposing quotes found.