It's kind of not about the quality of the art, as much as this is what I love doing and I'd have a worse time doing anything else. That's kind of as far as I think in terms of philosophy.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think it would be very difficult to maintain one kind of art or whatever for your whole life. I think it's unrealistic.
I finally got to the point where I decided I don't care if it's good art or bad art - it's what I do. I enjoy doing it, and people like it.
I don't think there is too much art involved in what I do.
I have a healthy view of what one can do with art.
There can be nothing exclusive about substantial art. It comes directly out of the heart of the experience of life and thinking about life and living life.
I mean, art for art's sake is ridiculous. Art is for the sake of one's needs.
Art resides in the quality of doing, process is not magic.
Art is for entertainment purposes, but it's also to reflect our dreams, our hopes, the present, the future the past - whether it's good or bad.
Art is the ultimate luxury good, but one that can make you think, give a you a blast of beauty and enhance your life. Even if the work's made of plasticine.
Art is good, bad, boring, ugly, useful to us or not.