Those objecting to the concept of race argue that the taxonomic definitions are arbitrary and subjective.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Race is a subject about which there are points of agreement, and about which there is no agreement; a subject that is either spoken of reluctantly, or not spoken of at all.
A race is what zoologists term a variety or subdivision of a species.
Obviously there is no such thing as race, and in many ways, sex is a continuum, not a binary. So it doesn't make sense to label people in that way.
Each race (or variety) is characterized by a more or less distinct combination of inherited morphological, behavioral, physiological traits.
A race is a work of art that people can look at and be affected in as many ways they're capable of understanding.
We must come to the point where we realize the concept of race is a false one. There is only one race, the human race.
The intellectual evolution of the race consists in an increase in the number, delicacy, complexity, permanence and speed of formation of such associations.
The different ness of races, moreover, is no evidence of superiority or of inferiority. This merely indicates that each race has certain gifts which the others do not possess.
The human race is a zone of living things that should be defined by tracing its confines.
Race and class are rendered distinct analytically only to produce the realization that the analysis of the one cannot proceed without the other. A different dynamic it seems to me is at work in the critique of new sexuality studies.
No opposing quotes found.