Scientists who play by someone else's rules don't have much chance of making discoveries.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
However, I believe that it would be difficult to have legitimate scientists agree to participate.
A great scientist is more open to a new idea than almost anybody.
My own beliefs are that the road to a scientific discovery is seldom direct and that it does not necessarily require great expertise. In fact, I am convinced that often a newcomer to a field has a great advantage because he is ignorant and does not know all the complicated reasons why a particular experiment should not be attempted.
I claim that all those who think they can cherry-pick science simply don't understand how science works. That's what I claim. And if they did, they'd be less prone to just assert that somehow scientists are clueless.
People don't generally listen to scientists much.
Some dreamers demand that scientists only discover things that can be used for good.
Science is not a game in which arbitrary rules are used to decide what explanations are to be permitted.
Though many have tried, no one has ever yet explained away the decisive fact that science, which can do so much, cannot decide what it ought to do.
It seems that this situation is not restricted to science but is more generally human.
There cannot be any impediment to science that will ultimately be good to the general public.