Quote

I personally have gone to photo shoots and see the pictures afterwards, and I don't look like me because I'm just so airbrushed and so, kind of, fake and almost plastic-looking, you know?

I do think it's important for young women to know that magazine covers are retouched. People don't really look like that.

I see myself on the cover of a magazine and I don't think that it looks like me at all. My first-ever photo shoot was for the cover of a lads' magazine.

I've never wanted to look like models on the cover of magazines. I represent the majority of women and I'm very proud of that.

If you've looked at all the glamour magazines lately, all the covers are actresses. If they are on those covers, they are going to try to emulate models. That's just the way it is.

A magazine is not just one person. And a fashion shoot is the same!

Like every girl, I felt amazing pressure to look like the popular girls, but no one told me the popular girls were all air brushed in magazines.

I find it strange that actors are on the covers of magazines.

Many billboards and magazine ads have resorted to showing isolated body parts rather than full-body portraits of models using or wearing products. This style of photography, known in the industry as abstract representation, allows the viewer to see himself in the advertisement, rather than the model.

It isn't glamorous until after the film is finished, and you are at the premiere and getting your picture on the cover of magazines.