Increasingly, the central question is becoming who will have access to the information these machines must have in storage to guarantee that the right decisions are made.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I believe people have a right to know what's going on with their information and how it's collected, how it's stored and who gets it.
What's happened with society is that we have created these devices, computers, which already can register and process huge amounts of information, which is a significant fraction of the amount of information that human beings themselves, as a species, can process.
Information imposes certain criteria on how it can be stored.
We have to make machines understand what they're doing, or they won't be able to come back and say, 'Why did you do that?'
The big question society will have to answer is whether it wants computers thinking like humans.
To be honest, I think we should find first the possibility to make it. Research is first - if you're not interested, you never can find something. Many things happen from forgotten machines - ones that are no longer used.
Data is a precious thing and will last longer than the systems themselves.
I favor strategies that encourage industry to include some sort of key recovery capability in their systems which would also address user requirements for access.
There is an enormous market demand for information. It just has to be fulfilled in a way that fits with the technology of our times.
I'm afraid for all those who'll have the bread snatched from their mouths by these machines. What business has science and capitalism got, bringing all these new inventions into the works, before society has produced a generation educated up to using them!
No opposing quotes found.