The players are out here to help win games and to improve, not to make a movie. They're not actors. They're players.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Actors are responsible to the people we play.
Actors are actors, and there should be a complete fluidity for anyone to play anything.
There are a lot of people out there who offer roles to actors because they'll elevate their movie to a place the movie would never reach.
Actors are people who are doing a job they want to do, which isn't the case for many of the people who watch what we do.
There's no point in making films unless you intend to show us something special, otherwise just go out and watch a play.
Film has to be reflecting the world that we live in, and that's all you want to be a part of. Actors inhabit the same planet as everyone else. It's a weird thing that happens when you're an actor because people hold you up because you somehow embody in parts groups of people or people's hopes or something.
As far as actors go, you're not going to find many ballplayers better than me.
Movies are in a much longer production conversation before an actor is even involved. I always thought of actors as the last piece of the puzzle - so you're a tool.
You need the actors to feel as much ownership of the performance and the direction of the story as you do to get the most out of everyone's potential. Part of it is just making sure we all have the same vision.
And because performing for a game involves real acting. The way they create a game is very similar now to how they create a film. I've always wanted to stretch my acting skills, and the timing being what it is, I couldn't say no.
No opposing quotes found.