I think they should separate Microsoft's application group from its operating system group.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Microsoft has a monopoly over the desktop operating systems.
Over the near term there is clearly the opportunity to work with Microsoft to do to a better job of creating a more secure Windows experience for users around the world.
I don't try to be a threat to MicroSoft, mainly because I don't really see MS as competition. Especially not Windows-the goals of Linux and Windows are simply so different.
I think Microsoft will have to change. I think that the business of Microsoft, the company of Microsoft, is going to continue to succeed. But I think the business model of Microsoft is going to have to change.
I think that Microsoft will increasingly feel margin pressure from Linux as well as people saying: well actually the applications that really matter to me are not on my PC. And so they're going to be able to extract less of a monopoly rent, so to speak.
Well, developers do want to touch a lot of customers. We have to make our platform very popular in order for them to do that. If we make their jobs easier, then they'll be more likely to stay on the Windows platform.
I thought Microsoft did a lot of things that were good and right building parts of the browser into the operating system. Then I thought it out and came up with reasons why it was a monopoly.
There's no magic line between an application and an operating system that some bureaucrat in Washington should draw.
If a startup stays in Microsoft, it does not have a chance, because all it tries to do goes against what Microsoft is about.
I think it would be absolutely reckless and irresponsible for anyone to try and break up Microsoft.