AC/DC is a prime example of taking that blues rock thing and just living in that world. They only really move the furniture around a little on each album, but it still works.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
With AC/DC, we've always started with rock, and we've just kept it going. The critic's view is always, 'They just made an album and it's the same as the last one.' I'll have fifteen of them, anytime.
That's usually what happens with AC/DC: you make an album, and then you're on the road flat out. And the only time you ever get near a studio is generally after you've done a year of touring.
I listen to older music like AC/DC.
There's just no great rock albums anymore. There's a lot of rock music out there, but it's very bland and disposable.
A lot of people say, 'AC/DC - that's the band with the little guy who runs around in school shorts!'
An album is a thing you take time out and go work on.
I wouldn't think a blues album would be that commercially successful, but I don't really care. I'd do it for the love of blues, not for the money. I've got plenty of money.
CDs, too. Totally corporate. They look real cheap and soulless and they don't smell of anything.
To actually put the time and energy into an album that would be better than Pull would be a hell of a lot of work, because I took that band really seriously, way more seriously than people took us. If you go back and listen to the records, you can hear it.
People don't really listen to albums anymore. They just find good songs.
No opposing quotes found.