There is a danger of Scottish politics being between two sets of dinosaurs... the Nationalists who can't accept they were rejected by the people, and some colleagues at Westminster who think nothing has changed.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It is one of the little known facts about modern Scottish politics that it is not quite as cut-throat as people think it is.
If the Scottish people decide to opt for independence, it would not be a good idea for Scotland to maintain a very rigid link to the pound.
Too often in the past, Scotland has been sidelined and ignored in the Westminster corridors of power, but that doesn't have to be the case anymore.
People don't want to go back to the days, pre-referendum, when the Westminster establishment sidelined and ignored Scotland. They want Scotland's voice to be heard.
I think Scotland could take a stand in a wonderful way, ecologically and morally and ethically.
What happens when there is a conflict between the Scottish parliament, if it was established, and the Westminster parliament? Who is supreme?
I want to change Scotland, but the only way we can change Scotland is by changing the Scottish Labour Party.
People in Scotland want the parliament but don't give a toss about the elections.
I am wholeheartedly in favour of an independent Scotland.
Why should Scotland be stopped from suggesting to the English people that we join a new union under new terms? Let's not try to dominate one another. Let's be a collection, like being in the pub with a kitty. When we vote in Scotland, we vote one way, but the other country votes another way and we always end up with what they vote for.