Prohibiting a visible religious sign, which isn't a manifestation of militancy, would look like a fight against religions.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
This is a war against terrorists. Not a war against a religion, but a war against terrorists.
I certainly would absolutely never do what some of my American colleagues do and object to religious symbols being used, putting crosses up in the public square and things like that. I don't fret about that at all; I'm quite happy about that.
The idea that somehow or other you can deal with all the problems in the world by banning a particular religious group from entering the U.S.A. is offensive and absurd.
Perhaps these Ten Commandments cases will be the turning point in the legal war against religion.
Religious conflict can be the bloodiest and cruelest conflicts that turn people into fanatics.
Let's face it: There are people who are extremists in every corner of society, and whatever flag they're waving is something Bad Religion has stood against.
Resorting to violence and the use of force at holy sites is unacceptable, whatever the reason might be.
Fascism is a religious concept.
Democratic societies can no longer give religious fanatics a free hand to abuse and murder non believers. Such action betrays contempt for the basic human rights which animate any democracy with meaning.
People will politicize religion; we see it in every faith, in every religion. We see it with Pat Robertson, in my opinion, and we see it with the Taliban.
No opposing quotes found.