The lowest budget U.S. films are ten times times better than shooting in Tibet.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
China's movie industry is growing a lot faster than that of the U.S.
The success of the film should depend on its budget.
The U.S., especially Hollywood, is so strong for film production.
In the U.S., it would be so much better if the studios made many more smaller films for niche markets rather than a few tent pole films that swamp cinemas and Hoover up all the funding.
Shooting films in Britain is always difficult, because we've never got enough money to make them.
For young filmmakers, Saw is a perfect film. It doesn't cost the GNP of almost every country of the world.
Western films don't do very well in India.
The whole reason one wants to do lower budget films is because the lower the budget, the bigger the ideas, the bigger the themes, the more interesting the art.
Film is the most expensive, highest risk industry in the world.
In America, they shoot budgets and schedules, and they don't shoot films any more. There's more opportunity in Europe to make films that at least have a purity of intent.
No opposing quotes found.