Proliferation of nuclear weapons to terrorist organisations is far more dangerous than proliferation of nuclear weapons to states, even states like North Korea.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We are categorically against proliferation of nuclear weapons.
The larger picture here is that a North Korea with nuclear weapons adds to the larger proliferation risk.
Nuclear proliferation - the proliferation of WMDs altogether - is one of the greatest dangers of our time.
National Missile Defense is of a nature to retrigger a proliferation of weapons, notably nuclear missiles. Everything that goes in the direction of proliferation is a bad direction.
The threat and use of violence is stimulating nuclear proliferation along with jihadi terrorism.
I think one country with nuclear weapons is one country too many.
The nexus between terrorism and nuclear weapons, or even nuclear material, is obviously a current concern.
Nuclear weapons offer us nothing but a balance of terror, and a balance of terror is still terror.
You know, people have actually changed the way they think about nuclear weapons now, post-Cold War, post-9/11. The threat of nuclear weapons is not so much Russia attacking the United States, China. It's not a state-to-state - it's obviously terrorism; it's proliferation.
We can be just as safe with a smaller, more efficient nuclear arsenal at less cost.
No opposing quotes found.