The economy is not an abstraction. The economy consists of people, and it will only grow if people feel secure and are reasonably free.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It's not enough to have economic growth. You have to distribute wealth throughout all of society.
If you're going to grow the economy, if people are going to have more income, you have to have stability in the marketplace.
There are many elements needed to secure economic growth. Certainly, people must be politically free to innovate, invest, build, and create things, and they must be incentivized to do so by knowing they can keep the rewards for their efforts.
There can be economy only where there is efficiency.
No economic system is perfect. But the American Free Enterprise system has empowered millions of people in the past. I know, because I saw it with my own eyes.
The idea of a non-growing economy may be an anathema to an economist. But the idea of a continually growing economy is an anathema to an ecologist.
Economy is the basis of society. When the economy is stable, society develops. The ideal economy combines the spiritual and the material, and the best commodities to trade in are sincerity and love.
I think in part the reason is that seeing an economy that is, in many ways, quite different from the one grows up in, helps crystallize issues: in one's own environment, one takes too much for granted, without asking why things are the way they are.
Economists create their own worlds. We're like little gods with our artificial economics, wanting to see what happens.
The basic idea was that if a country would put its economy as an integrated piece of the world system, that it would benefit from that with economic growth. I concur with that basic view.
No opposing quotes found.