Now, being on the cover of Vanity Fair is as important as being in great movies. The lines are very, very blurred.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We really care about photography at 'Vanity Fair.'
There's a way of filming where you can get rid of the vanity and of trying to make something beautiful.
I'm not sure if guys are supposed to read Vanity Fair. I feel very metrosexual with it but am not sure it's in my comfort zone.
I would be lying if I said it wasn't cool to see myself on the cover of 'Vanity Fair,' right? It's, like, what am I doing there? This is bizarre.
A lot of the time, as an actor, you don't have the freedom to change what your lines are, and they can often be very unnatural or difficult to portray in a real light.
The way the films look will never entertain an audience alone. It has to be in the service of a good story with great characters.
Unless the story line carries the scenes, the scenes don't really mean anything.
In Hollywood films everything is tidied up at the end with clean lines and clean character definitions. It's sort of unsatisfying.
It's very nice to be in a show where your vanity is completely out of the picture.
Film is a medium of clear lines and broad strikes - which can be fantastic - but compared to the subtleties and nuances of a novel, it doesn't even get close.