I think any actor would agree that you can't replace theater. It's immediate. You have the energy of the crowd and every single night it's different.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think every actor should go back and do theater periodically.
I'll eventually go back to theater because the feeling of being on stage where you have the audience right there, you can't replace that with anything.
It's a shame how a lot of actors use theater as a stepping stone to film and television work; I think it shouldn't be treated that way. Maybe it's narcissism or something. I think we should always go back to it. I try and do a play a year, and I think that's really helped me.
I wouldn't be the same actor if I couldn't do theater.
Theatre's a whole different beast to film. It requires a lot more of you.
Theater actors like to change character roles. They don't like to always do the same thing.
I have directed good actors and have gone through the process which is more detailed in theater in a way. You have to get people to stay for two or three hours in a performance. They need more talk and rehearsal than in films.
Acting was merely a pastime; I wanted to make films. But theatre, ah - now that was a labour of love. Can there be anything better than performing without retakes and cuts, in front of people you can see, hearing them breathe in the darkness of the hall?
I think the wonderful thing about doing theater is that it's more of an actor's medium. I think that film is more of a director's medium. You can't edit something out on stage. It's there.
The great difference between screen acting and theatre acting is that screen acting is about reacting - 75% of the time, great screen actors are great reactors.
No opposing quotes found.