I don't intend to write the same kind of book for the rest of my life because I feel I would not be satisfied only writing in one mode.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I was always writing the books that I wanted to write, books that demanded to be written at the time. But, like most writers, you start off feeling your way.
I used to write fiction, non-fiction, fiction, non-fiction and have a clear pattern because I'd need a break from one style when going into the next book.
I feel like writing a book there's always a version in your head that's an amazing version, but then you write the version that you can write.
My mode as a writer is to layer different perspectives: the scientific, the philosophical, the political, the journalistic. When you layer them, you get a really wholesome, interesting picture.
I can write for a long time on one novel and not get tired.
I tend to write one character at a time. But I don't write the entirety of one character at a time.
Every book is like starting over again. I've written books every way possible - from using tight outlines to writing from the seat of my pants. Both ways work.
I just realized quite early on that I'm not going to be the type who can write a novel every two years. I think you need to feel an urgency about the act. Otherwise, when you read it, you feel no urgency, either. So I don't write unless I really feel I need to, and that's a luxury.
I really strive to bring something new to each book. I don't want to write the same book over and over again.
I think I write and publish as often as I do because I can't bear being without a book to work on... I don't feel I have this to say or that to say or this story to tell, but I know I want to be occupied with the writing process while I'm living.
No opposing quotes found.