And so I think that if the person has the funds, the network, and the equipment to do this, and also the experience, which is the key factor, then they can be quite deadly.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Death frames the high wire. But I don't see myself as taking risks. I do all of the preparations that a non-death seeker would do.
Watching daring, high-tech criminals in action, I have the same thought that probably occurs to other moviegoers: if these guys just held on to some of the money they spend on equipment, they wouldn't have to turn to a life of crime.
Outside of dumb luck, the number one way serial killers are caught is through the help of the public.
There are risks and costs to action. But they are far less than the long range risks of comfortable inaction.
I know people like to read about serial killers and spies, but most of us will never encounter these things. Sadly, most of the threats we encounter are at home.
Risk more than others think safe.
I read a book recently by a psychiatrist who was able to interview a few serial killers and she had a thesis on how you could figure these people out. And she thinks that there are things that could tell you whether someone has the potential to do that.
Often you need to take some risk, but it must be a realistic risk, you can't take a crazy risk.
If somebody plans to carry out a series of murders... then this is obviously an evil and pre-meditated attack and in that case, there could be a deterrent effect.
Getting anything off the ground is going to require a little bit of risk. That risk starts with sharing the idea.
No opposing quotes found.