Where conscious subjectivity is concerned, there is no distinction between the observation and the thing observed.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There's certainly nothing original about the observation that conscious experience poses a hard problem.
Distinctions drawn by the mind are not necessarily equivalent to distinctions in reality.
There's no way to remove the observer - us - from our perceptions of the world.
The restriction of studies of human intellect and character to studies of conscious states was not without influence on a scientific studies of animal psychology.
I'm not interested in observed reality.
No school of philosophy has ever solved this question of whether being determines consciousness or the other way around. It may be a false antithesis.
We cannot observe external things without some degree of Thought; nor can we reflect upon our Thoughts, without being influenced in the course of our reflection by the Things which we have observed.
There is no other who experiences your thoughts or your feelings.
There is no reality of consciousness independent of the effects of various vehicles of content on subsequent action (and hence, of course, on memory).
It is possible to interpret without observing, but not to observe without interpreting.