Where questions of style and exposition are concerned I try to follow a simple maxim: if you can't say it clearly you don't understand it yourself.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Style is a simple way of saying complicated things.
I analyse in my own way, in very simple, no-jargon language. If somebody is talking in very complicated way, I never like that.
As a writer I've learned certain lessons. One of them is to be careful about how you put a view, and to bear in mind how easily and readily you'll be misinterpreted.
Style is the perfection of a point of view.
I am not very good at expressing myself in a simple way so it can create mis-understandings and I hate that.
An easy way to find your own style is to exaggerate yourself a bit and then find a balance.
The method of exposition which philosophers have adopted leads many to suppose that they are simply inquiries, that they have no interest in the conclusions at which they arrive, and that their primary concern is to follow their premises to their logical conclusions.
I think a lot of writers are tempted to add complexity by over-complicating things, but always remember that most natural rules/laws are, at their core, simple. Start simple, and build from there, or you risk getting yourself and your readers tangled.
The fact that you are willing to say, 'I do not understand, and it is fine,' is the greatest understanding you could exhibit.
I'm an enemy of exposition. I feel there's no need to overstate.