In the age of globalisation, pooled sovereignty means more power, not less.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
We are now physically, politically, and economically one world and nations so interdependent that the absolute national sovereignty of nations is no longer possible.
History shows that, more often than not, loss of sovereignty leads to liberalisation imposed in the interests of the powerful.
People are seeking more power in the individual and less in government and institutions; they want more cooperation and less competition.
Sovereignty is as necessary as ever.
Sovereignty is not just at the national level; that's the mistake of Brexit that other people make.
You see, another reason for nationalization was that private ownership meant fragmentation.
Relinquishing apparent national sovereignty does not have to entail a loss of national sovereignty, but can actually be a benefit.
Globalization, far from putting an end to power diplomacy between States, has, on the contrary, intensified it.
Nations, great nations have limitations. All nations have limitations. Even great powers have limitations.
Sovereignty is a word that is used often but it has really no specific meaning. Sovereignty today is nominal. Any number of countries that are sovereign are sovereign only nominally and relatively.
No opposing quotes found.