I really hate those books where the murderer turns out to be somebody you never heard of who pops up in the last chapter.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Plot is tremendously important to me: I can't stand books where nothing happens, and I can't imagine ever writing a novel without at least one murder.
My books are never about the crimes. They are about how the characters react to the crimes.
I hate books; they only teach us to talk about things we know nothing about.
As a writer, you're making a pact with the reader; you're saying, 'Look, I know and you know that if this book was really a murder investigation, it would be a thousand pages long and would be very dull, and you would be very unhappy with the ending.'
With the crime novels, it's delightful to have protagonists I can revisit in book after book. It's like having a fictitious family.
For me, as a fan, when I read book series, I tend to be the most judgmental of the last book.
I'll never have so compelling a figure within my embrace as Joan of Arc; there will never be a book whose last chapter is so very hard to get right.
I don't get far enough into a boring book to hate it.
What I hate in fiction is when the author knows better than the characters what they should do.
Even the worst book can give us something to think about.