Measurements, observations, descriptions can only be considered scientific when they are independently confirmed by other people.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Every science consists in the coordination of facts; if the different observations were entirely isolated, there would be no science.
Now obviously the propositions of the system have reference to matters of empirical fact; if they did not, they could have no claim to be called scientific.
Science is defined in various ways, but today it is generally restricted to something which is experimental, which is repeatable, which can be predicted, and which is falsifiable.
Truth in science is always determined from observational facts.
But a science is exact to the extent that its method measures up to and is adequate to its object.
Science has everything to say about what is possible. Science has nothing to say about what is permissible.
Science is nothing but perception.
As a scientist, you're not supposed to make decisions without the data.
Science is based solely on doubt-based, disinterested examination of the natural and physical world. It is entirely independent of personal belief. There is a very important, fundamental concomitant - that is to accept absolutely nothing whatsoever, for which there is no evidence, as having any fundamental validity.
Science consists exactly of those forms of knowledge that can be verified and duplicated by anybody.