It's dangerous to think too much about how a film will be received. Filmmaking is not a popularity contest. Some would disagree.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
One can never anticipate how audiences will respond. One of the lessons that I've learned over the years is to that no matter what my feeling or opinion might be about a given film, once you give it to the audience, they own it.
When you're acting in a movie, you never consider the reception of it. It's impossible to predict how something will be received. Even if you think it's the greatest thing in the world, other people might not like it. Or agree with it.
The time a movie is made is unique, not only from the talent that is available but if the public was ready for it.
We make films that we ourselves would want to see and then hope that other people would want to see it. If you try to analyze audiences or think there's some sophisticated recipe for success, then I think you are doomed. You're making it too complicated.
Films do seem prestigious and glamorous, but when you create something, you want people to see it. TV still reaches so many more people; it still really appeals to me.
No film should try to follow a trend, and do what film people think the public wants. There's no such thing as knowing what the public wants.
Movies are hard work. The public doesn't see that. The critics don't see it. But they're a lot of work. A lot of work.
You don't want a movie to have a lot of awards and no audience.
Even on a $100 million film, people will complain that they haven't got enough money and enough time, so that's always going to be an element in filmmaking.
Audience members are only concerned about the story, the concept, the bells and whistles and the noise that a popular film starts to make even before it's popular. So audiences will not be drawn to the technology; they'll be drawn to the story. And I hope it always remains that way.
No opposing quotes found.