The size of a studio film lets you see technology in a way that you wouldn't on an independent film, like the gadgets and the angles and all that.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The film industry needs to confront the physical footprint of the way films get made.
I can't say that I wouldn't prefer to make small films, basically because I think they are probably more interesting in terms of the material. But every now and again, it's quite good to do a big one.
A big budget studio film is slower, they've got so much to create around you. Everything is more complicated.
The thing I've come to learn is that what's great about small independent films is the intimacy and the communication that occurs when you're making them.
There are certain films you want to see on the big screen.
It doesn't matter how big or small your film is: you still don't have enough money. You don't have enough time to shoot it.
The size of the budget doesn't make that much of a difference because the kind of issues I have on a low budget film I I have on a big budget film as well, but they're just much bigger.
Making a film, every film, is a big gamble, large or small. The more that you do it, the more you're aware of that.
The size of the budget doesn't make that much of a difference because the kind of issues I have on a low budget film I have on a big budget film as well, but they're just much bigger.
Some of the smallest things on a smaller film, to me, are greater achievements than on a big film when you have the resources and the time and everything else.