I think the thing is with a movie that has this much science fiction in it; you need characters who are more science fact, if you know what I mean, than they are human.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We are living in a science fiction world.
Science fiction is about worlds you don't know and worlds you can create, like in 'Avatar'.
I think you can do science fiction, but you have to ground it in some realism. People need to identify with the characters, with their plights and their issues.
The possibilities in sci-fi are wonderful. The subject is bigger than everything we know.
It's kind of a misnomer about science fiction that science fiction is about anything other than people. It's about people doing stuff, sometimes doing extraordinary stuff.
Science is not the glamour that's portrayed in films. It's a lot of drudgery work, along with the wonderfully exciting periods when you discover something.
Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful.
I'm on a crusade to get movie directors to get their science right because, more often than they believe, the science is more extraordinary than anything they can invent.
It's clear that science and science fiction have overlapping populations.
I'm a huge science fiction fan.