The law serves of nought else in these days but for to do wrong, for nothing is spread almost but false matters by color of the law for reward, dread and favor and so no remedy is had in the Court of Equity in any way.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It cannot be assumed that equity was following common law whenever they agreed, any more than the converse.
No nation can answer for the equity of proceedings in all its inferior courts. It suffices to provide a supreme judicature by which error and partiality may be corrected.
This desire for equity must not lead to an excess of welfare, where nobody is responsible for anything.
It seems to me that an unjust law is no law at all.
I'm a lawyer. I go for due process; I go for fairness and equity - these values mean a lot to me.
If the law is a bad law, there is always the contingent right to take action that you would not otherwise take.
According to the law of nature it is only fair that no one should become richer through damages and injuries suffered by another.
If the law doesn't apply equally to everybody, then you don't really have a system of law.
Well you know, all law is about injustice.
Every lawsuit results from somebody doing something wrong. If everybody did right, we wouldn't need laws.
No opposing quotes found.