The slow rejection of the foreign skin grafts fascinated me. How could the host distinguish another person's skin from his own?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I was performing skin grafts and became interested in why skin wouldn't graft permanently.
None of us is responsible for the complexion of his skin. This fact of nature offers no clue to the character or quality of the person underneath.
I was asked by an NPR reporter once why don't I talk about race that often. I said, 'It's because I'm a neurosurgeon.' And she thought that was a strange response... I said, 'You see, when I take someone to the operating room, I'm actually operating on the thing that makes them who they are. The skin doesn't make them who they are.'
I've never been pigeonholed and I've experienced so many different kinds of skin - what man will do and won't do, what you should do and shouldn't do. This is what's exciting about being an actor; where philosophy majors sit in classrooms or write books about human behavior, we're actually acting them out in front of cameras.
I know who I am and I've always been comfortable in my own skin.
One of the reasons I write is to be in other people's skin.
It's good to have to put yourself in someone else's skin. It's all-consuming.
I'm amazed if people are happy in their own skin.
I cannot understand why any young man - or young woman, for that matter - would wish to undergo the painful process of disfiguring the skin with various multicolored representations of people, animals, and various symbols.
A bit of lusting after someone does wonders for the skin.
No opposing quotes found.