I have had this longstanding interest in going back to school to get a Ph.D. in art history. I was especially interested in exploring this idea of the ecstatic impulse in an artist.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I set my sights upon becoming the kind of artist who would make a contribution to art history.
Two of my grandfathers had been artists, lifelong oil painters, so I was exposed to art very young. I've always been interested in it, although I never pursued it as a career or even as an avocation.
I have long been interested in exploring and advancing the valuable relationships between the arts and society.
I knew I was artistic, and I wanted to do something in the arts.
I was an art student at the time, like thousands of others.
I was always interested in photography and other forms of art.
I have always said to young artists that scholastic training and the studying of art history are crucial to fully developing as an artist.
I am interested in art as a means of living a life; not as a means of making a living.
In the mid- to late '60s to the mid-'70s, when I was a student, there was a major change in the thinking about what art can be and how art is made.
I feel like I became an artist by default. I went to art college, but my interest was always more towards film than painting or sculpture.